Are Our Observations of Science a Distortive Reading of a Featureless Reality?

A Godless Reality is a Featureless Reality because any particular features like the speed of light or the mass ratio between a proton and an electron face the question: who selected those particular features? If we deny the existence of a managing God then we are left with no power that can pick particular features.

This realization has been troublesome for philosophy-bent scientists for some time now. It led to the theory of the multi-verse, which gives a logical explanation to the particular features of the observable universe, at the price of extreme weirdness. An alternative resolution emerges from the hypothesis that reality is a featureless random soup, and every reading of it reflects something about us, the observers.

Proper science is half way through to this approach. We have already concluded that in the microcosm the observer affects the observation. Can we extend this premise to all observations of science?

Here is an evolutionary explanation: when the evolving creatures in Darwin's evolution begin to develop sensory elements and information processors their chance to 'read' an impinging call is very low, but eventually some sort of radiation or other influence is being recorded. This elevates the chance of a similar ping to be read again while other encounters remain with low probability. Over time by chances some particular information is registered and saturates the evolving system. It creates a selective view of the reality without, including the appearance of features which reflect the reading history of the evolving creatures, not a fair take of reality as it is.

This is the pretext for the erection of the Darwinian Cage in which are are locked, and from where we may wish to break out.

https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/article/view/0/52319