Consider two sets of prospective future event, E1 and E2. Further consider a community of observers, O, of both E1 and E2. Each observer evaluates the probability of every event in each set. Let A be a subset of O which assigns a probability one to all events in E1 and probability zero to all events in E2. Let B be a subset of O that assigns a probability one to all events in E2, and a probability zero to all events in E1. It is clear that the A observers will be hard presse

Recent algorithmic innovation for AI inferential engines appeared quite impressive. Social media like Reddit and LinkedIn are far ahead of the slow peer-reviewed literature, and what appears there, even if a fraction thereto is practical, is quite consequential. New methods to essentializing data are coming forth. This means that AI engines can read volumes of data, extract a highly reduced summary and stores only that summary. Applied across the board this will allow data ce

How many unfunded Edisons and un-invented light bulbs are there today? When the developers of the state of the art are deciding who to fund to develop tomorrow's art, the funding goes narrow, and misses leap-frogging technology of the future. The solution: bring to the fore imaginative people who are not vested in today's technology. This can be done formally. When assembling a funding committee to bring in someone who is not an expert, is not deeply involved in the funded fi

The quintessential construct of human math and science is the venerated equation. The left side of the equal sign is declared equal to the right side. See below, arguably, the 17 core equation of human science. Is the universe ruled and expressed through equations? Here is a challenge to the supremacy of the notion of 'equation': Nothing is equal to anything else. Things may be very different or slightly different, but not indistinguishable (not talking about double labeling)